IAN
FOWLER and DAVID ZEITLYN (eds),
African
Crossroads: intersections between history and anthropology in Cameroon
.
Cameroon Studies 2, Oxford and Providence RI: Berghahn, 1996, 213 pp.,
£30.00, ISBN 1 57181 859 6 hard covers, £11.95, ISBN 1 57181 9266
paperback.
Although
this book’s editors do not present it as a
Festschrift
to Elizabeth Chilver, in several positive senses it is. Not only is the work
dedicated to the seminal Grassfields scholar and co-founder of the Cameroon
Grassfields Working Group (GWG), it emerges from a GWG meeting in Oxford at
which the editors ‘took the opportunity to conspire’, as they put
it, to produce a set of essays in recognition of her lifelong dedication to
Grassfield studies. Furthermore, this volume celebrates Chilver’s
influence on Grassfield studies by emphasising the combination of historical
and anthropological approaches to Grassfield studies characteristic of her own
work.
The
book is composed of nine essays which focus on the late pre-colonial and early
colonial period under the Germans in Cameroon. Fowler and Zeitlyn usefully
prefigure these essays with an introduction which re-examines the ‘Tikar
problem’ regarding the perplexing claims to Tikar origin among the
leaders of many of the Grassfield kingdoms. Fowler and Zeitlyn place the
problem in the context of kingship in the Grassfields, arguing convincingly
that claims to foreign origin among the elite of the region must be seen in
terms of struggles for authority which move dynastic models not only backwards
in time (the model common in western Europe) but also outward in space. Claims
to authority are thus paradoxically embedded in myths of foreign origin in the
Grassfields, myths which contribute to territorialisation and hierarchical
stratifications within the kingdoms.
This
fundamental theme regarding Grassfield models of power is echoed in various
ways by four of the essays which follow. In a detailed historical analysis
Austen presents the mythical aspects of the Duala middleman relationship with
the German administrations, emphasising the manner in which violent oppression
and frequent confrontation have been reinvented by the Duala over the course of
the century and are now presented as a ‘golden age’ to be
contrasted with the French rule which followed. Similarly to myths of Tikar
origin in the Grassfields, Austen shows how Duala identity has come to be
inseparable from the mythologies which cluster around the Duala-German
relationship. Just as Tikar (and even ‘Anglo-Saxon’) origin has
become intrinsic to identity in the Grassfields, Germany has been incorporated
within Duala identity. In another historically rich essay, this time focusing
on the Moghamo of the western Grassfields. O’Niel similarly depicts the
ways in which the Germans were portrayed according to local models of the wild
and the inhuman upon their arrival in the Grassfields in 1889. The political
alignment of the first Germans to reach the area with Bali-Nyonga was to affect
Moghamo villages catastrophically. O’Niel describes how, by means of
this new partnership, the latter kingdom gained the weapons, the training and
the permission to raid the Moghamo at will for slaves and ‘labour
recruits’ for the German plantations on the coast. Again, as with the
Duala, the deep ad lasting impact which the Germans were to have on the area
was represented and negotiated in terms of local political models of royal
might, animality and the foreign-a model shared by the Bali-Nyonga and the
Moghamo alike.
It
was this very model of power and hierarchy which-thanks to the arrival of the
Germans-was called into question by the rebellions of the male cadets described
by Warnier. In an essay which draws upon his 1993 work
L’Esprit
de l’enterprise au Cameroun
.
Warnier adds a piece to the puzzle of Grassfield politics which had been
sorely wanting; a description of resistance and rebellion to kingship and
hierarchy to add to the neo-functionalist analyses which had preceded it and
which systematically ignored everything which seemed inimical to the system as
idealised by palace informants in colonial reports. In an equally important
essay which brings out the aesthetic dimension of politics in the Grassfields,
Geary describes the astonishing appropriation of German-style military costumes
by the Bali-Nyonga and Bamum courts at the turn of the century. She reveals
how the struggle for power inherent in the relations between the early German
administration and its chosen middlemen in the region was physically negotiated
by means of the appropriation of the uniforms of colonial officers or local
reinventions of them. Geary convincingly contextualises the collection of
these exotic costumes within Grassfields systems of accumulation and
redistribution of objects of material culture from foreign kingdoms. She also
highlights the way in which the gifts of military regalia the Germans made to
the Bamum eventually threatened to backfire on them as the Bamum, having
literally incorporated this new source of external power, gained influence in
the region.
The
remaining five essays leave issues regarding political cosmology aside and
concentrate squarely on historical and religious issues. Fardon opens the
volume with a discussion of Bali identity in the Grassfields, tracing the
origins of the Bali from Chamba-Leko speakers in present-day Nigeria and
examining the ways in which that identity is now under renegotiation to suit
the demands of ‘modernity’. Fanso and Chem-Langhêê
contribute a short piece on Nso’ warfare at the turn of the century.
Burnham contributes an essay on the agonistic relation between the Gbaya and
the more powerful Fulbe of the Haute Sangha region of Cameroon. He reveals
that the French, under the hopelessly ill-advised Brazza, raided the Gbaya in
an attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Fulbe ‘nobility’ by
subduing their ‘pagan’ enemies. Burnham reveals that a static
historical model of the region was favoured by the French administration, since
it lent credence to their presumption of Fulbe supremacy. Finally, Banadzem
and Tardits both contribute work on religion in the Grassfields. Banadzem
writes on Nso’ traditional beliefs and the introduction and partial
success of the ‘world religions’ to the kingdom. Tardits offers a
detailed analysis of a religion of salvation elaborated under the prolific King
(later Sultan) Njoya, an original doctrine influenced by syncretised elements
from both the Islamic and the Christian traditions with which he became
familiar during the course of his reign.
Though
in many ways a highly specialist collection of essays, this volume nevertheless
cannot be contained within the boundaries of ‘area studies’. In
its serious attention to historical detail, its questioning of received wisdom
regarding African political models and their relation to globalisation and the
emerging nation state, this work provides yet more evidence of the vigorous
state of Grassfield studies today-a vigour fostered in no small way by
Elizabeth Chilver.
NICOLAS
ARGENTI
University
of East Anglia